Truth-gated AI For professionals burned by aiapply / LazyApply

AI career help that refuses to invent your story.

Built for professionals who want faster execution without losing credibility, control, or pricing clarity. We do not auto-submit junk, invent achievements, or trap you in opaque pricing. If a human writer is better for your case, we'll say so on this page.

$30 one-time · 24-hour delivery · money-back if it doesn't show specifics

Why this category needs a different stance

The AI-job-tool category is contaminated. Trust is the actual bottleneck, not features.

aiapply holds a BBB F rating. LazyApply is documented submitting to 50 wrong roles. Sonara shut down in 2024 at 5.4% interview rate. Every new AI career tool pays a reputation tax on the category. The product is built around acknowledging that — and refusing the behaviors that earned it.

Truth-gated rewrite

The AI is constrained by design. It can restructure and surface what your CV already says. It cannot invent achievements, dates, or titles. The constraint is technical, not promised.

No auto-apply theatre

Every submission requires your tap. No bulk-blasting. No "we'll handle it." If you wanted that, aiapply will be cheaper and more aggressive — we say it on this page.

Transparent pricing, transparent limits

$30 one-time. $99/month if you continue. Cancel any day. No hidden tiers, no "auto-apply tier you discover post-signup," no charging after cancellation.

Honest category comparison table covering five products: aiapply (BBB rating F, opaque pricing, spam-volume auto-apply, never recommended for quality), LazyApply ($99-999 per year, spam risk, never recommended), Sonara (defunct as of February 2024, 5.4 percent interview rate, cautionary tale), human resume writer in Dubai ($600-2500, 5-10 days turnaround, high trust, best for C-suite narrative), AI Career Consultant ($30 entry plus $99 per month, truth-gated by design, founder-operated, recommended for GCC $30-99 tier). Footer notes that the human writer is the better buy for a defining C-suite personal narrative.
Igor wrote a long-form comparison of these options on the blog. The summary above is the honest version — including the cases where the AI is not the right answer.
Why we say what we say

Honest about what we are not

  • Not for senior executive narrative-craft at C-suite level — that is a human resume writer's job.
  • Not for one-shot high-stakes applications — a $1,400 specialist can outperform there.
  • Not a coach — we do not replace 1:1 advisory.
  • We are the right answer for ATS-blind document failures, application volume, hourly speed, and per-vacancy tailoring at $30-$99.
Honest concerns

What you're probably thinking

"This sounds like another aiapply clone with better marketing." Different at three structural points: pricing is published, auto-apply is blocked by design, and the founder uses his own name on the site. None of those are slogans — they are checkable.
"AI tools fabricate too much." Truth-gating is a design rule, not a marketing phrase. The AI cannot generate content about you that is not in your Master Resume. If your Master Resume is thin, the report says so — it does not paper over it.
"I don't want to get trapped in a subscription." The entry point is $30 one-time. Cancel only matters if you opt up to Core — and that's monthly, no annual lock, no auto-tier.
Pricing

Start with $30. Don't subscribe until you've seen the work.

Core — only after trust

Per-vacancy tailoring + hourly matching + cover letters. Monthly, cancel anytime.

$99 / mo
Why this can be trusted in a low-trust category

What stays true here that other AI tools cannot say

Igor Sergunin, founder of AI Career Consultant. Placeholder portrait pending replacement with photograph.
Igor Sergunin · Founder LinkedIn profile

Real name, real face, public honesty about the category

First paying user. I publish my comparison of AI-CC vs human resume writers on the blog — including the cases where the human writer wins for your scenario.

Truth-gated by design, not promise

The AI is structurally constrained. It cannot invent. If your CV is thin on results, the diagnostic flags it — it does not paper over it with fabricated impact bullets.

Refund if we don't deliver specifics

$30 money-back if the diagnostic report doesn't surface specific, citable failure points. The bar is "did this teach you something concrete?" — not subjective satisfaction.