Specialist comp routinely lags market by 25-40% when episodic searchers send under-engineered applications. The technical depth is there; the document doesn't communicate it.
When you apply only a few times a year, each one has to be right.
Built for engineers, IT specialists, finance professionals, and in-house lawyers who search episodically, think critically, and want precision — without a monthly subscription you'll forget to cancel.
$30 one-time · no subscription · 24-hour turnaround · money-back if unspecific
The specialist-application problem
Specialists don't need more applications. They need each one to land.
Engineers, finance analysts, in-house lawyers, design engineers — most apply 2-5 times a year, only when something compelling appears. The pain isn't volume. It's that each application carries unusual weight, but the candidate has no recent reps with what works in the current ATS landscape. Senior IT salaries get compressed 25-40% by exactly this — strong specialists with weak documents staying where they are.
Specialist CVs tend to be dense — jargon, acronyms, tooling lists, stack chronology. Workday and iCIMS misread density worse than they misread thin CVs. The smarter the CV is, the more likely the parser fails it.
If you apply twice a year, each is 50% of your year. Procrastination becomes its own cost — by the time the CV is "ready" the window has closed.
What you receive
A precision-grade diagnostic, not motivational generic feedback
- Specific line-by-line failure points with parser-side reasoning
- Role-level alignment check (e.g. senior vs staff vs principal language)
- Concrete rewrite recommendations you can apply yourself — no subscription required to use them
- Optional: continue to Core $99/mo if you want per-vacancy tailoring during an active window. Most specialists don't.
Honest concerns
What you're probably thinking
"I can do this in ChatGPT."
You can — and if you have the time and patience to design the right prompts, run multiple iterations, calibrate against ATS quirks, you'll get close. The product is for specialists who'd rather hand off the orchestration. You keep your DIY judgment for the technical work where it matters more.
"I don't want another subscription."
You don't need one to start. $30 one-time fits an episodic search naturally. Subscription only makes sense if you're in an active 2-3 month window — and even then, monthly cancel.
"I only apply a few times a year."
Exactly. Which raises the value of getting each one right. If you apply 50 times a year, generic AI helps. If you apply twice, each one is worth more attention than a generic tool gives.
Pricing
$30, one time. No monthly trap.
Recommended
Precision diagnostic
One-time. No subscription. 24-hour turnaround. Money-back if specifics don't appear in the report.
$30
Core — only if you want it during an active window
If you're in a focused 2-3 month search and want per-vacancy tailoring + hourly matches, $99/month, cancel any month.
$99 / mo
Who handles your data
Why technical specialists trust this process
Real name, public honesty about scope
First paying user. I publish my comparison of AI tools vs human writers on the blog — including when the human writer is the better buy for your case.
Truth-gated · no fabricated impact
The AI cannot generate achievements that aren't already in your CV. If your CV is thin, the diagnostic says so — it does not paper over with manufactured bullets.
Private by default · one command to wipe
Private Telegram delivery. Frankfurt EU jurisdiction at rest. /delete wipes everything in seconds.